The Role of Secondary Meaning in Trademark Registration

Trademark Registration Lawyer

Trademark Registration Lawyer in South Bangalore

Introduction

Can a simple, everyday word become a powerful trademark? In intellectual property law, the answer lies in secondary meaning—the transformative process by which ordinary descriptive terms evolve into strong brand identifiers.

When consumers hear “Apple” and immediately think of technology, or “Amazon” and imagine e-commerce, they are experiencing secondary meaning in action. This legal doctrine allows common words to transcend their dictionary meaning and gain trademark protection.
It’s not about what the word means in general—it’s about what it means to consumers.


What Is Secondary Meaning?

Secondary meaning refers to the stage at which a descriptive term becomes uniquely associated with a particular brand or business. Traditionally, trademarks act as source identifiers, and when consumers start identifying a descriptive word with one specific producer rather than the product itself, the word acquires distinctiveness.

A classic example is the brand “Apple.” While the primary meaning is a fruit, decades of consistent use and extensive marketing have made the term synonymous with electronic products. This shift in public perception represents its secondary meaning.


Legal Framework in India

The doctrine of secondary meaning in India is anchored in the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

Section 9(1): Absolute Grounds for Refusal

This section states that trademarks which are:

  • Devoid of distinctive character, or
  • Merely descriptive of goods or services

cannot be registered.

This is the first hurdle for descriptive marks.

Proviso to Section 9(1): The Saving Clause

This proviso states that a descriptive mark shall not be refused registration if, before the filing date, it has acquired a distinctive character through use.
This legal exception captures the essence of secondary meaning.

Section 32: Post-Registration Distinctiveness

This section protects a trademark that was initially non-distinctive but later acquired secondary meaning after registration and before a legal challenge.
The law thus acknowledges that descriptive words can become protectable trademarks if they gain public recognition through sustained use.


How to Prove Secondary Meaning?

The burden of proof lies entirely on the trademark applicant. To establish secondary meaning, the applicant must present strong, persuasive evidence. Key factors include:

1. Duration and Extent of Use

Long-term, consistent, and geographically widespread use strengthens the claim.

2. Sales Volume and Market Share

Significant sales figures demonstrate commercial success and consumer recognition.

3. Advertising and Promotional Efforts

Heavy marketing expenditure, campaigns, and brand visibility help create and prove association.

4. Consumer Surveys

Independent surveys are persuasive proof that the public links the mark to a single source.

5. Trade Recognition

Declarations from industry experts, competitors, or trade associations add credibility to the claim.


Key Case Laws on Secondary Meaning in India
Bajaj Electricals Ltd. v. Metals & Allied Products (1988)

The Delhi High Court recognized that even descriptive terms could acquire distinctiveness through use, setting a foundational understanding for Indian jurisprudence.

Nestle India Ltd. v. Mood Hospitality (P) Ltd. (2017)

In determining distinctiveness of the mark “KitKat,” the court clarified that:

  • Distinctiveness must relate to specific goods/services
  • Foreign market recognition can support but not replace Indian consumer recognition
  • Secondary meaning must pre-exist the trademark application date
T.V. Venugopal v. Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd. (2011) 4 SCC 85

The Supreme Court held that secondary meaning arises when a descriptive term, through long and exclusive use, becomes uniquely associated with one source in the minds of consumers.

Recent Decisions (2025)
  • Oswal’s “One For All” was rejected for lacking secondary meaning and remaining descriptive.
  • The Delhi High Court reiterated that generic words like “Yatra” cannot be monopolized despite wide usage, as they fail to acquire secondary meaning.

Conclusion

The doctrine of secondary meaning remains central to trademark law, especially for brands seeking protection for descriptive or non-inherently distinctive marks. By investing in brand reputation, ensuring consistent use, and building strong consumer recognition, businesses can transform ordinary words into powerful trademarks.

This principle ensures a fair balance between:

  • Allowing fair competition among traders, and
  • Protecting the goodwill and identity that a business builds over time.

A descriptive word can indeed become a distinctive trademark—if consumers have learned to associate it exclusively with one brand.


Disclaimer: This blog is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Privacy laws may vary based on circumstances and jurisdiction. Readers are advised to consult a qualified legal professional, such as Bisani Legal, for specific advice regarding data protection, privacy rights, or related legal concerns.

Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner