A cheque bounce, the dishonour of a cheque for insufficient funds or other reasons, is one of the most common commercial disputes in India, and it carries a powerful criminal-side remedy under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Acting within the strict statutory timeline is what makes or breaks the case. Bisani Legal handles cheque-bounce matters for payees seeking recovery and for drawers defending a complaint.
A cheque you received has been returned unpaid and you need to act within the deadline.
You need a statutory demand notice drafted correctly to preserve your rights.
You are filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
You are the drawer of a dishonoured cheque facing a complaint and need a defence.
A cheque-bounce matter overlaps with a larger debt you want to recover.
You need to enforce or settle a cheque-bounce case efficiently.
|
Statute |
Key sections |
What it governs |
|
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 |
Section 138 (dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds); Section 139 (presumption in favour of the holder); Section 142 (cognizance and timeline) |
The criminal-side remedy for a bounced cheque, the demand-notice requirement, and the complaint timeline. |
|
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 |
Provisions on complaint procedure |
The procedure for filing and trying the complaint, replacing the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973. |
|
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 |
Order 37 (summary suits) |
The parallel civil route for recovering the underlying debt. |
(Verification note for handoff: the substantive Section 138 remedy is unchanged, but the complaint procedure now runs under the BNSS. Confirm the relevant BNSS procedural references before publication.)
Cheque-bounce cases are won on timing and documentation, so we act on the clock. The remedy under Section 138 depends on a correctly drafted demand notice sent within the statutory window after dishonour, and a complaint filed within the period that follows. Miss either step and an otherwise strong case can be lost on a technicality, so we move immediately on receipt. For our payee clients, we pair the criminal complaint with a view to the underlying debt, often running a civil recovery route alongside, because the cheque case provides pressure while the civil route provides a money decree. The statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for a debt works in the payee’s favour, and we use it. For our drawer clients facing a complaint, we build the defence on the recognised grounds, rebutting the presumption with evidence. We are candid about prospects, because a cheque case against an asset-less drawer may win on paper and recover nothing.
Recent matter highlights
These scenarios are illustrative, written to show the format only, and must be confirmed against real anonymised matters or removed before publication.
A payee acted within the statutory notice and complaint window on a dishonoured cheque, and the matter resolved with payment before trial.
A payee ran a civil recovery route alongside the cheque complaint, using the criminal pressure while pursuing a money decree.
A drawer facing a complaint built a defence that rebutted the statutory presumption on the facts.
Q1. My cheque bounced, how long do I have to act?
The Negotiable Instruments Act sets strict timelines for sending the demand notice after dishonour and for filing the complaint thereafter. Missing them can extinguish the remedy.
Q2. Is a cheque-bounce case criminal or civil?
It is a criminal complaint under Section 138, though it functions as a powerful recovery tool. A civil suit for the underlying debt can run alongside.
Q3. What is the demand notice?
A written notice to the drawer demanding payment within the statutory period after dishonour. It is a precondition to the complaint and must be drafted correctly.
Q4. What is the presumption under Section 139?
The law presumes the cheque was issued to discharge a debt or liability, placing the burden on the drawer to rebut it.
Q5. What defences are available to the drawer?
Recognised grounds include rebutting the presumption, showing the cheque was not for a legally enforceable debt, or procedural defects in the complaint.
Q6. Can I recover the cheque amount and more?
The court can order payment and, in appropriate cases, compensation. A parallel civil suit can pursue interest and costs on the debt.
Q7. What if the drawer has no money?
Assess recoverability first. A conviction or order against an asset-less drawer may not translate into actual recovery.
Q8. Can a cheque-bounce case be settled?
Yes, and many are, often through compounding with payment. Settlement frequently serves the payee’s real interest, recovery, faster than trial.
Q9. Does the new criminal code affect cheque cases?
The substantive Section 138 remedy is unchanged. The procedure now runs under the BNSS, which replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Q10. Should I also file a civil suit?
Often yes, particularly for the underlying debt and interest, since the criminal and civil routes serve different purposes and can reinforce each other.
Related reading
Cheque Bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881
Debt Recovery Process in India
The bottom line
A bounced cheque gives the payee a fast, pressure-laden remedy, but only if the notice and complaint deadlines are met to the day. The statutory presumption favours the holder, which makes early, correct action decisive. Bisani Legal helps Bengaluru’s businesses and individuals act on dishonoured cheques in time, and defends drawers on the grounds that actually work.
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. If you require guidance regarding a specific legal matter, you may schedule a consultation with Bisani Legal to discuss your circumstances and understand the legal options available to you.